Archive for November, 2007


Business of Documentaries

Posted November 29, 07 by AlBaraa

At the 41st Annual International Quorum or Motion Pictures Producers a panel of noted documentary producers and directors spoke about successful funding, marketing and distribution techniques for documentary filmmakers. This panel includes Doug Block, driector of 51 Birch Street, J.R. Morley, producer of Super Size Me, and Amy Sewell, producer of Mad Hot Ballroom.

Watch the Video: The Business of Documentaries

- — -

My Notes from the Video

Business of Documentaries

Doug Block
Director, 51 Birch Street

  • Starts off with a passionate idea that you want to get out.
  • Do well to not lose money in theatrical, hold on to rights — pay a distributor a fee, share advertising costs, and do a lot of the work yourself.
  • Film cost was 300K. 75-100K to get out
  • Most money was from HBO as pre-sales…this led to conflicts from major distributors who’s parent company was a rival of Time Warner.
  • GO out and make the best movie you can make. There is a place for docs in the market if its good.

Marketing

J. R. Morely
Producer, Super-size Me

  • Cost of theatrical of a doc is a crap-shoot, cost of doing it compared to the benefit is usually not a good one.
  • You’ll make the money back on Cable and DVD. The only time you would do it as a theatrical is if you want to qualify for the Academy

Distribution

Amy Sewwell
Producer, Mad Hot Ballroom

  • Targeted a market, soundtrack, etc.
  • There are smart people in pockets all across America that WANT to see documentaries, don’t care about what others say.
  • Lawyers, sales agents, investors — the doc was an LLC business model, shares were sold. It was a $500K movie, $10K was 1 share. Investors got 15% return on investment.
  • Good side for the LLC is if its a loss, you count is as an income loss, if you make a salary of $100K a year, and you lost $10K, you report that you made only $90K that year. Tax write offs aren’t that good though in LLC.

Leveraging the Web

Doug Block
Director, 51 Birch Street

  • Many web doc-makers don’t exploit their resources.
  • Give active daily updates for people to watch and be engaged, this way you can grow an email list. All those names move forward to your next production.

Truly Indie

Doug Block
Director, 51 Birch Street

  • Put up a certain amount of money for every city you want to open up in
  • Open up in five cities
  • They opened in; NYC, LA, Miniapollis, SanFran, Chi-town — $50,000 was the result
  • Have a national publict that coordinates for each local paper.


When not to seek Theatrical Release

J. R. Morely
Producer, Super-size Me

  • When you sell off the rights, make sure that you get a sizeable advance for it. They sold it to a large distributor and to showtime.
  • For a small doc do a simple small contract deal only if you will make money. DVD sales is where the smaller documentary film was to make its money
  • Film business is chaning. How money comes in and goes out is diff. Netflix is now buying films and they want to do that.
  • The way they did the funding for their film was to fund it themselves as a private corporation

Go ahead leave your comments. Give us your thoughts.
If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe:
     



Archiving the Low-Budget Way

Posted November 21, 07 by AlBaraa

archive.jpg

Where do you keep stuff that you want to actually keep?

Last year I made a post about proper file management: http://www.leechonfilms.com/file-management-25.htm — An addition to file management on your drives is file management off of your drives.

I’ve learned that off loading completed projects from your hard drive into an efficient archive system is very important, ESPECIALLY when you have limited disc space.

My Current setup:

  • Internal Hard Drive - 150 GB - — - System files
  • External Hard Drive - 200 GB - — - Download Files
  • External Hard Drive - 250 GB - — - Personal Files
  • External Hard Drive - 500 GB - — - System and Personal backup
  • External Hard Drive - 750 GB - — - Project Files

750 GB may seem like a lot, but when you have a handful of small projects with uncompressed video or even a large scale project like (documentary, seminar, feature film) it fills up quicker than you would think. Currently I’m working on two large scale projects; Tufaan (documentary) and a Seminar…both projects have over 40 one hour tapes that I want to have live access to while editing. If you do the math, that’s 500+ GB per project.

If you are working on more than one large scale project at a time, make sure you have a dedicated drive for it. Heck, its useful to have a separate editing machine per project. If you can afford it, two to three editing machines per project to make the editing process faster if you have more than one person doing the editing.

- — -

How do you archive after the project is complete?

dvd-spindle.jpg

If you are dealing with a small scale project (total size under 50GB), then compress the entire project folder using WinRAR (make sure you select the option where it chops it up into DVD size chunks) and then burn the .RAR files to multiple DVDs.

If its a medium or large scale project (50+ GB in size) compress the footage files using WinRAR seperately (works as a backup for your tape footage), and then compress the project file without the footage.

 

 

 

Where do you keep all these DVDs of archived footage?

disc_binder.jpg

buy yourself a few of these binders to keep the archived stuff easily accessible when needed.

 

 

 

 

That’s a LOT of DVDs! I don’t want to have to store that much stuff for a single project.

The other option I can think of is you invest in a Blu-Ray (50 GB discs) or HD-DVD drive (25GB discs), but each disc comes for $20-$25 each. Not to mention $500+ for the drive itself. Personally I think it would be worth it to invest in this if you are working with HD (high definition) video.

hd.jpg

In the case of HD video, you will also want TB (Terabyte…1000 Gigabytes) size drives, especially since HD footage takes up a lot of space.

Go ahead leave your comments. Give us your thoughts.
If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe:
     



Sense of Urgency - How the Pros Do It

Posted November 19, 07 by AlBaraa

What is failure…?

…an opportunity to learn! – Let’s critique the shots that did get shot for Free Parking, and juice it for all the gems and lessons we can get from it. The first scene from the compilation of yesterday’s post is of our main character going tschool while he’s late. Lets compare it to something we may already be familiar with…

The following is the scene from “Back to the Future” where Marty realizes that he’s late for school.

This next sequence is from Chicken Little where Ace is rushing to school because he has missed his bus.

Now let’s compare that to the sequence I posted yesterday:

Here are a few things that I’ve noticed that were different from my own “Late for Class!” scene:

  • If you have seen the entire movie, you will notice neither of these two scenes are the opening sequences, they are actually after the major opening sequence. Read my script and You’ll notice that I’ve opened the film with this before I’ve even managed to have the audience’s attention.
  • There is an upbeat sound score for each of the sequences to add to the fast-pace nature of the scene and the sense of urgency the character has.
  • There are a lot of shots of the surrounding area and environment which gives a feeling and vibe for the character’s setting. Most of my shots were close quarters.
  • There are many elements of humor in the sequence. There is hardly any humor in my sequence…which is sad considering the film is suppose to be fun and entertaining.
  • There is hardly any dialog, just action.
  • Scenes consist most of long-shots and extreme long-shots of the character, with the occational medium-shot and medium close-up to give off elements of the character’s personality. My own medium close-ups and medium shots didn’t give out any elements of the character’s personality except perhaps in the part when the engine isn’t working in the flash back.
  • The camera is always in constant fast-pace motion either to keep up with the object of focus or to follow it as it goes, bring about, while most of my own shots are just simple fly by follow shots and static position.
  • There is plenty of interactivity of the character with its surroundings, while in mine there was hardly any.

Was there anything else that you noticed?

Can anyone recommend any good sequences from movies that I can compare the “Gimmi My Keys!!” scene?

Go ahead leave your comments. Give us your thoughts.
If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe: